Показаны сообщения с ярлыком car politics. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком car politics. Показать все сообщения

Two Shifty-Eyed Guys We Now Have to Believe In

Us Automakers Obama AnalysisLook, no matter what your politics, you know that GM’s bankruptcy had to happen, and today happened to be the day. At his late-morning press conference (video below), President Obama stressed the positive, naturally: Government will get out quickly, warranties will be safe, today’s sacrifices will produce an America that “makes things” again.

It was a good statement of the facts, such as they are. Here is some of what he didn’t (and couldn’t) say to the nation. (Apologies to the parties depicted in the photo at right; it was too good to pass up.)

  1. The old GM will take at least a year, probably more, to accomplish its makeover to GM.2—which is predicated on the economy cooperating. But if the new company can’t pass the stress test of operating successfully in a 9-million-cars-a-year sales environment, what happens then? To be fair, no one can answer that.
  2. All the stakeholders (bondholders, UAW-CAW, the Treasury) want out ASAP, but transformation of the GM product line will take at least a year. Yet GM is in a better position than Chrysler, which has awful cars and will have to wait on Fiat to fill its pipeline. Ford may be the big gainer here.
  3. 20,000 people will be on the street, 12 plants (at least) will close, dealerships and some suppliers will go bye-bye, creating an enormous cascade of pain and economic cost.
  4. As Fritz Henderson acknowledged in his subsequent press conference, GM was carrying simply unsustainable debt and had no way out. You have to look at this as, he said, a “remarkable opportunity to address” balance sheet and product issues.

Embedded video from CNN Video

I then watched Jared Bernstein on Andrea Mitchell’s show (msnbc.com, not posted yet). He’s an economist and member of the auto task force, who was asked the big political question: “How would the government handle it if the company decided to keep promoting the sale of big gas-hogging trucks?”

His response: The government as shareholder has as its major concern the profitable running of the company. If it came to that, the government would want GM to sell trucks if it was the right management decision. The government’s environmental goals should be dealt with outside the boardroom.

That’s the first statement I’ve heard on what could be a very dicey issue. You’ve got to have hope.

Will the government be able to keep its political and social goals out of the boardroom?

—jgoods



Related posts:



Related posts:



Extended Warranties for Your Car: Worth Buying?

auto_warranty_385x261Your phone rings. You answer only to hear a computerized robot voice telling you that your auto warranty is about to expire and you need to  extend your coverage. 

I think it’s safe to say that anytime a computer calls, the offer can be written off as a scam. Still, there are people who fall for it.

Good thing U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., was smart enough to know it was a scam when he got the call. Now, he’s calling for a federal investigation into what he calls “robo-dialer harassment.”

I hope the feds can help put an end to the extended-warranty scam calls, because I believe they’re giving a bad rep to honest offers that car buyers might encounter at dealerships. Yes, you read that right, I used the words “honest” and “dealerships” in the same sentence, something I haven’t been known to do much. 

The truth is, extended warranties have their place in the automotive world, whether you’re buying new or used. When buying a car from a dealer, the extended warranty is one of those often-dismissed items that the financial manager presents at the time of document signing. Granted, they can be expensive, but so can unexpected repair bills.

Believe it or not, I have advice on this whole topic:

  • If someone (or something) calls you offering an extended warranty, hang up.
  • If you buy a new car, there’s usually no need to buy the extended warranty. Unless you buy a Land Rover.
  • If you buy a used car, I highly recommend dishing out the dough for the extended warranty; just make sure you know exactly what you’re getting, and ask about deductibles and pro-rated coverage.
  • Before you buy a warranty from the dealership, check with your credit union. I recently saved $1,000 and got better coverage through mine than I would have gotten at the dealer.

In the end, extended warranties are as much about peace of mind as they are about potentially saving you money.

Just don’t ever buy from a robot.

What do you think about extended car warranties: Are they scams or necessities?

-tgriffith



Related posts:



Related posts:



The Hurricane That’ll Bring Down the Auto Industry (But We WILL Rebuild)

It's hurricane season for the auto industry

It's hurricane season for the auto industry

I’ve had enough. I’ve decided that it’s time to let nature take its course with the auto industry.

As jgoods posted earlier, one way or another the car companies are going to go through a bankruptcy. It’s just a matter of what form it takes.

When a hurricane is approaching the Gulf Coast, there’s nothing our government can do but sit back, evacuate people, and hope that rebuilding doesn’t take too long. The collapse of the U.S. automakers is a similar storm, and there’s no stopping it.

Instead of spending money on saving the companies, let’s start thinking about how we can help rebuild them after they shatter. GM is on the right track by eliminating brands and focusing on becoming a leaner company. Doing so is like boarding up their windows to help weather the storm.

American automakers have lived in excess and luxury for years, and the reality of it all is coming crashing down. In this storm, people will lose their jobs. Car brands will disappear. How much is the government willing to spend to prevent this? I think taxpayers have spent enough money on prevention, and now we need to focus on response - getting those who lose their jobs back to work, either in the auto industry or rebuilding the highways our cars drive.

The government is shouldering all the financial responsibility to save an industry that employs a lot of its citizens. That’s noble, but misguided. If a private organization (Big Oil, anyone?) wants to invest in saving the car companies, by all means, let them. Government involvement, though, should be limited to overseeing the bankruptcies and subsequent rebuilding.

I agree the U.S. can’t stand by and let the domestic auto manufacturers disappear forever. I’d just feel better if we invested in the rebuilding of leaner companies, rather than supporting the modern ways that have become so archaic and wasteful. Bring on the storm.

Do you care what happens to the U.S. automakers? Would their collapse affect you? 

-tgriffith



Related posts:



Related posts: